Abortions and Politics
How Pro-life Candidates Can Win
Have you noticed the TV ads of pro-abortion candidates, who, by the way, almost all reside in the "Party of Death,"
better known as the Democratic Party? "I will always defend a woman's right to choose." Interpretation: "I will
always defend a woman's right to have her unborn child killed, if she so chooses."
Pro-life candidates could have a field day with such a sadistic and satanic statement, if only they used their
brains and were not ashamed of their respect for human life and their love of God and His will.
They could literally have the pro-choice [to kill unborn children] candidate slumping and hiding behind the
podium. They could have him/her rue the day they uttered such an ungodly statement.
To you pro-life candidates: You've got everything going for you. You have the truth and science on your side, but
most of all, you have God, Who said, "Thou Shalt Not Kill." There's not a scientist in the entire world who could
refute that human life begins at conception.
Also, according to the latest poll, 53% of the American people are now pro-life. Republican Pro-life candidates in
2004 cleaned up. Seats were gained in the Senate and House.
In the majority opinion in the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized the killing of unborn children right up to birth,
it was stated that no one knows when human life begins, etc., etc. Well, now we DO KNOW; we have DNA for the
So, maybe I should stop here. The above says it all; what more does one need to know, to understand why the killing
of unborn children is abominable and a travesty of justice?
However, for those who are hell bent on the destruction of human life, no matter what, and will take their chances
when they are ready to meet their Maker, I will continue, and who knows? Just maybe you will see the light of God
and not the light from the eternal fires of hell.
Abortion is too soft a word. Naturally, those who condone the killing of unborn children, the pro-choicers, like it,
but you don't have to play into their hands and use it. Besides itís the wrong terminology. To be correct, they
should say induced or surgical abortions. Just plain abortions also means spontaneous abortions. (miscarriages).
Pro-life candidates should not just say that they're pro-life and that they're against abortions. They should
speak the truth and say that they are against the KILLING OF UNBORN CHILDREN, that it is inhumane and not
conducive to a civilized society; that all human life is sacred and just because unborn children are still in the
mother's womb, should NOT be used as an EXCUSE to kill them, any more than killing a child after birth, since both
are still developing and cannot survive on their own.
When a pro-choice [to kill unborn children] person is running for a political office, they plaster it all over
the TV that they will defend a woman's right "to choose."
Choose what? What to say, or to write? NO! The right to have their unborn child killed. They don't even have the
"guts" to say "abortion," because of what it means.
Now, they have even softened it up a little more. Now, it's to "protect a woman's reproductive freedom." How
about that LIE?
I'm also for protecting a woman's reproductive freedom, but, when a woman conceives, when the male sperm fertilizes
the woman's ovum (egg), her reproductive freedom is over, done, el fin, the end. So, there's nothing to protect,
unless she was tied down and prevented from having sexual intercourse.
But, as usual, the abortion mills and their biggest advocates, NARAL, NOW, and their army of enablers and
condoners, the pro-choicers, continue to lie to the American people.
But still, as is the custom of the pro-abort Democratic Party, they will do anything and everything to get elected.
What's a lie compared to the killing of unborn children?
For once, I would like to see a pro-lifer respond to such a TV ad with the following ad:
The decision to end a human life should be left to God, our Creator. I agree with our founding fathers, who wrote
the Declaration of Independence:
'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator
with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.'
Notice it does NOT say, "born equal." It says all men are CREATED equal. It is a scientific fact that human life
begins at conception. If one does not respect the sanctity of human life, as oulined in the Declaration of
Independence, IS THIS A PERSON YOU CAN TRUST?
The above is what pro-life candidates should say. They should be proud that they're pro-life. If anyone should
plaster it all over the media, it should be the pro-life candidate. Don't hide it, as many pro-life politicians
Don't be afraid to invoke God's name and don't be ashamed that you honor God's will, "Thou Shalt Not Kill," and
uphold the sanctity of human life.
Itís not enough to just say that youíre pro-life. You have to explain, "why," you're pro-life. People have to
learn, and what better way than by a pro-life politician, who is running for office? They have the forum and they
have the opportunity.
The truth will convince any person with just one fiber of decency left in their entire body, that to kill an unborn
child is unconscionable; it is inhumane and has rocked the foundation of our country. Look around. Do you like what
Can there be any doubt that the killing of 1.4 million unborn children yearly gives people the perception that
life is cheap? It will be stored in the brain, and have a bearing on all future actions. So when children kill
children and teen age girls kill their newborn child, then don't be shocked.
TV ads have to be short, but during a debate, the pro-life candidate can go into more detail -- such as the
"My opponent says he will always defend a womanís right to choose. I don't know what that means. Choose what? Choose
her religion, choose what to say, or write? Choose what?
I think he means that he will always defend a woman's right to have her unborn child killed, but he doesnít have
the 'guts' to say that, because he knows it's evil and destroys a human life.
Instead, he tries to make the killing of human beings sound more palatable, so he sugar coats it by using the
euphemism, 'the right to choose,' hoping that the true meaning will somehow escape your cognizance.
"Now, he/she softens up the killing even more so, by saying 'a woman's reproductive freedom.' Heck, I'm all for
that, too. But, once a woman is with child, she has already taken advantage of her reproductive freedom and should
have no choice to kill another human being.
There's not a scientist in the entire world who could refute that human life begins at conception. Everytime a
child is killed in his or her mother's womb, God's Commandment, "Thou Shalt Not Kill," is broken. Think about
"I, on the other hand, will always speak the truth. I will give you no double-talk, and yes, I do believe in God and
I will not compromise my faith and sell my soul to the devil just to get votes. If that's what you want, my
opponent is your man, as he even revels in his desire to defend a woman's right to kill her unborn child, if she
As for me, I am dedicated to protect ALL human life, even the most voiceless and littlest among us and not just those
who can contribute money to a campaign or cast a vote.